2. Why did the British pass The Intolerable Acts? 1 decade ago. The Intolerable Acts were a series of laws issued by King George III in response to the colonies’ Boston Tea Party. The Intolerable Acts were punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party.The laws were meant to punish the Massachusetts colonists for their defiance in the Tea Party protest in reaction to changes in taxation by the British Government. Richard Henry Lee of Virginia, for example, described the acts as "a most wicked System for destroying the liberty of America. Colonial . Congress also called on the American colonists to be more frugal and industrious and to avoid extravagant activities like horse-racing, gambling, plays, and dances. Passed on March 30, 1774, the Boston Port Act … Rudolf Ackermann 1808. George Washington called this the "Murder Act" because he believed that it allowed British officials to harass Americans and then escape justice. Stamp Act and the Beginning of Political Activism. 2 Answers. The Intolerable Acts heavily targeted Massachusetts, and … What did the Intolerable Acts lead to? Biography. Why did Britain impose these new acts? The first three acts are also referred to collectively as the Coercive Acts, instituted by the British in response to the Boston Tea Party. 1. Among the land transferred to Quebec was much of the Ohio Country, which had been promised to several colonies through their charters and to which many had already laid claim. The new Quartering Act allowed a governor to house soldiers in other buildings if suitable quarters were not provided. Georgians did not complain when Britain imposed the Intolerable Acts because: 1. Results on Intolerable Acts. [1] This question of the extent of Parliament's sovereignty in the colonies was the issue underlying what became the American Revolution. Boston Massacre After the Boston Massacre. The British instated the acts to make an example of the colonies after the Boston Tea Party, and the outrage they caused became the major push that led to the outbreak American Revolution in 1775. Although the act stipulated for witnesses to be reimbursed after having traveled at their own expense across the Atlantic, it was not stipulated that this would include reimbursement for lost earnings during the period for which they would be unable to work, leaving few with the ability to testify. The Intolerable Acts were an important force in uniting the 13 American colonies. What did each of these Acts do and what was the message the Britain was trying to convey by the sum total of them? Join now. The British Parliament hoped these punitive measures would, by making an example of Massachusetts, reverse the trend of colonial resistance to parliamentary authority that had begun with the 1764 Sugar Act. Get the answers you need, now! They would not be able to receive shipments of goods they needed. Also included in the act was the stipulation that the colony's seat of government should be moved to Salem and Marblehead made a port of entry. Typically, soldiers were first to be placed in existing barracks and public houses, but thereafter could be housed in inns, victualing houses, empty building, barns, and other unoccupied structures. The Intolerable Acts compelled a number of patriot leaders, committees of correspondence, and colonial legislatures to endorse the call for a general congress of the thirteen colonies to discuss how to resolve the newest crisis. 2 Answers. The king began taxing products from the colonies, and they were not happy about this. In addition, there was added a small tax. How do … 2. Currency Act . [2], The Boston Port Act was the first of the laws passed in 1774 in response to the Boston Tea Party. The Intolerable Acts were a series of laws passed by the British Parliament in the mid-1770s. The Intolerable Acts, also called the Coercive Acts, were the British response to the Massachusetts Tea Party, a political protest during which the revolutionary group the Sons of Liberty boarded several ships in Boston Harbor and threw 342 crates of tea into the harbor to protest the British Tea Act. In Great Britain, these laws were referred to as the Coercive Acts.. It was known as the Coercive Act in Great Britain, and it was passed by the British Parliament and was signed into law by King George in 1774. These led to the convening of the First Continental Congress at Philadelphia on September 5. The Intolerable Acts closed the port of Boston until they paid for tea. The British Parliament passed these laws to punish the Massachusetts colony for the Boston Tea Party. So, this was how colonists respond to the 5 Intolerable Acts. The Acts include: Quartering Act. It was direct punishment to the city of Boston for the Boston Tea Party. The Continental Congress created the Continental Association, an agreement to boycott British goods. Fun Ways to Learn Facts. Many in the colonies felt it was unnecessary as British soldiers had received a fair trial after the Boston Massacre. This would have a negative economic impact on the colonists. The Quartering Act allowed Britain to house troops wherever it wanted. Parliament believed that these acts, such as the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Acts of 1767, were legitimate means of having the colonies pay their fair share of the costs of maintaining the British Empire. What did the colonist do about it? History. Question: What did the intolerable acts tax. The Intolerable Acts were punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party. In London the news that the colonists had again defied Parliament and had also destroyed British property was exasperating. When would British open the harbor again? Committees were authorized in every county, … [9] The acts promoted sympathy for Massachusetts and encouraged colonists from the otherwise diverse colonies to form committees of correspondence which sent delegates to the First Continental Congress. These were the harshest of all. They would not be able to receive shipments of goods they needed. (2020, October 2). The four acts were the Boston Port Act, the Massachusetts Government Act, the Administration of Justice Act, and the Quartering Act. Answer Save. In Great Britain, these laws were referred to as the Coercive Acts. Be the first to answer! Although unrelated to the other four Acts, it was passed in the same legislative session and seen by the colonists as one of the Intolerable Acts. The colonies formed the Continental Congress as a response to these Acts. "American Revolution: The Intolerable Acts." As tensions escalated, the American Revolutionary War broke out in April 1775, leading in July 1776 to the declaration of an independent United States of America. The British named these acts the Coercive Acts because they were designed to coerce, or force the colonists to pay for the dumped tea. Related Questions. Clearly the passage of the Intolerable Acts was a key moment in the lead up to this war. [4] Many colonists believed the act was unnecessary because British soldiers had been given a fair trial following the Boston Massacre in 1770. Colonists outside Massachusetts feared that their governments could now also be changed by the legislative fiat of Parliament. As supplies in the city dwindled, other colonies began sending relief to the blockaded city. Hickman, Kennedy. The colonists partook in this action because Parliament had passed the Tea Act, which granted the British East India Company a monopoly on tea sales in the colonies, thereby saving the company from bankruptcy. Favorite Answer. In the years after the French and Indian War, Parliament attempted to levy taxes, such as the Stamp Act and Townshend Acts, on the colonies to aid in covering the cost of maintaining the empire. Answer Save. On May 10, 1773, Parliament passed the Tea Act with the goal of aiding the struggling British East India Company. 5 points michaelcalvin11 Asked 06/09/2017. Georgia’s wealth was not in trade it was agricultural production. The Intolerable Acts are laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774. Browsing: Intolerable Acts. This is of course a somewhat subjective question, but most would agree that the two best actions were to boycott the goods and to submit an official list of grievances to the Crown, since these were non …